Quotient 2026
3,447 citizens · 50+ localities · 17 indicators
A Citizen Survey · Blue Ribbon Movement

How WISE
is your
locality?

We asked 3,447 citizens across Mumbai and its periphery to rate their own neighbourhood on Wellbeing, Inclusion, Sustainability, and Entrepreneurship & Expression. The numbers tell one story. The voices tell another.

Overall WISE Quotient
2.42 out of 4
Mumbai's localities score just above the midpoint of the WISE scale. Inside that average lies a city of contradictions.
3,447
CITIZEN RESPONSES
50+
LOCALITIES SURVEYED
76
YOUTH FELLOWS
3.18
BELONGING SCORE
Finding 01

Citizens want exactly what their localities lack

When asked what matters most to them, citizens overwhelmingly chose Wellbeing and Sustainability. When asked to rate their localities on these, they gave the lowest scores. Two-thirds of citizens prioritise the two pillars where Mumbai is failing them most.

Wellbeing
PRIORITY
33%
SCORE
2.23/4
Sustainability
PRIORITY
32%
SCORE
2.14/4
Inclusion
PRIORITY
19%
SCORE
2.84/4
Enterprise
& Expression
PRIORITY
16%
SCORE
2.48/4
65%

of citizens placed Wellbeing or Sustainability as their top priority. These are the two pillars where Mumbai's localities score lowest. The gap between what citizens care about and what they live with is the story.

Finding 02

Sixteen lenses on a locality

Each pillar is measured through four indicators. The bottom five city-wide are all environmental or climate-related. The strongest single indicator is Belonging — citizens still feel "this is my place" in a city famous for being transactional.

W
Wellbeing
Clean air, comfort, public spaces, and mental health
2.23/4
Air quality 2.36
Heat liveability 1.96
Public spaces 2.47
Mental health support 2.13
I
Inclusion
Safety, accessibility, economic inclusion, and belonging
2.84/4
Safety while walking 2.79
Accessibility 2.68
Economic inclusion 2.66
Belonging 3.18
S
Sustainability
Green cover, waste, climate resilience, and citizen habits
2.14/4
Green cover 2.41
Waste collection 2.05
Monsoon resilience 2.00
Sustainable habits 2.08
E
Entrepreneurship & Expression
Livelihoods, skill spaces, arts, and citizen voice
2.48/4
Youth & women livelihoods 2.96
Skill spaces 2.23
Arts & culture spaces 2.32
Citizen voice 2.32
Finding 03

One city, many Mumbais

The gap between Mumbai's strongest locality and weakest is almost half the entire WISE scale. Same city. Same survey. Same year.

Top 10

(n ≥ 30)
Wadala n=82 3.13
Kharghar n=34 3.12
Raheja Vihar, Powai n=42 3.10
Malwani Malad n=32 3.10
Chembur n=35 2.98
Lower Parel n=62 2.88
Sion n=42 2.87
Chembur Camp n=83 2.82
Naigaon, Dadar East n=45 2.81
Mahim Koliwada n=39 2.62

Bottom 10

(n ≥ 30)
Indira Nagar, Govandi n=54 1.19
Shivaji Nagar, Govandi n=159 1.49
Rafiq Nagar, Govandi n=33 1.63
Sai Baba Nagar, Govandi n=59 1.69
Vikhroli West n=38 1.80
Rafi Nagar, Govandi n=96 1.87
Baiganwadi, Govandi n=41 2.05
Dharavi n=276 2.11
Khetwadi n=144 2.26
Khar Road East n=130 2.38
A closer look

Dharavi's split soul

Mumbai's most-photographed locality scores 1.45 on Wellbeing and 1.62 on Sustainability — among the lowest in the city. But on Inclusion, Dharavi scores 3.13, higher than Bandra Colony or Lower Parel. Citizens here rate their physical conditions among the worst in Mumbai, but they feel more belonging than residents of half the city's wealthy enclaves.

Wellbeing
1.45
Among the lowest in Mumbai. Air, heat, and public space pressures are severe.
Belonging
3.62
Higher than Wadala, Kharghar, or Powai. In Dharavi, citizens know who they are.
A civic emergency

The Govandi gap

M/East ward, dominated by Govandi's sub-localities, makes up 16% of our sample. It scores WISE 1.62, against F/North's 3.06 — a gap of 1.44 points on a 4-point scale. On Safety alone, Govandi scores 1.43 vs F/North's 3.52 — citizens in Govandi rate their localities half as safe as citizens just kilometres away. This is the case for civic action.

Govandi WISE
1.62
The lowest-scoring ward in Mumbai. Six Govandi localities sit at the bottom of the city ranking.
F/North WISE
3.06
The strongest ward. Same city, same survey. Almost double the score.
Finding 04

Hope is socially produced, not built

Localities with higher WISE scores have higher hope (r = 0.76 across 27 localities). But not equally so. Hope tracks belonging, safety, and inclusion far more strongly than it tracks waste systems or green cover.

Mumbai's hopeful citizens aren't living in the cleanest localities. They're living in the most connected ones. Belonging, voice, and a sense of being heard create hope. Infrastructure doesn't, by itself.

PILLAR → HOPE CORRELATION
I
0.59
E
0.43
W
0.35
S
0.33

Pearson correlation coefficient between
each pillar and the standalone Hope item
(n = 3,369; individual-level)

In their words

The voices behind the numbers

3,447 citizens told us what they love about their localities. These are some of them. Translations from Hindi/Marathi kept light.

"
Here everyone lives together, swinging together.
Shivaji Nagar, Govandi Love
"
In Barkat Ali there is a mosque so whenever I feel anxious I go there.
Wadala Love
"
It's windy and doesn't feel suffocating.
Mahim Koliwada Love
"
Hardworking. Humanity. People here help each other in difficult times.
Rafi Nagar, Govandi Love
"
Senior-friendly footpaths and better healthcare access.
Khetwadi Would improve
"
I would make the area more eco-friendly and sustainable.
Lower Parel Would improve
"
Cleanliness. Pollution-free area. Healthcare and good schooling. Safe streets at night.
Rafi Nagar, Govandi Would improve
"
Small changes can create a big impact in our locality.
Rafi Nagar, Govandi Love
"
Agar superpower hoti, toh mein mere area mein kisi ko bhi koi taklif hone nahin deta.
Chembur Would improve
Finding 05

The longer they live there, the more they care — and the more they criticise

Mumbaikars who've lived in their locality for 20 years or more rate the locality lower on WISE than newer residents — but they feel stronger belonging. Long-term residents aren't nostalgic. They've seen it change, and they want better.

YEARS IN LOCALITY
WISE SCORE
BELONGING
0–2 years n=150
2.48
2.74
2–5 years n=272
2.50
2.96
5–10 years n=487
2.51
3.01
10–20 years n=1,151
2.47
3.29
20+ years n=1,357
2.33
3.36
Finding 06

What citizens don't know is also data

One in five citizens couldn't answer where to go for mental health support in their locality. For citizens above 60, that number rises to one in three. Awareness gaps tell us as much about a locality as service gaps do.

Mental health support
20%
Arts & culture spaces
12%
Skill spaces
11%
Citizen voice channels
10%
Climate resilience
9%

% OF RESPONDENTS WHO ANSWERED "DON'T KNOW" — AWARENESS GAPS DISTINCT FROM SERVICE GAPS

Where we go from here

What the data calls for

A WISE Mumbai isn't a slogan. It's a measurable claim. Here's what citizens are telling us to work on.

01

Treat Govandi as a civic emergency, not a footnote

Six Govandi sub-localities sit at the very bottom of Mumbai's WISE ranking. The 1.44-point gap between Mumbai's strongest and weakest wards is the central inequity story this data tells.

02

Climate liveability is the city's failing pillar

Four of the five lowest-scored indicators across all of Mumbai are climate or environmental: heat, monsoon, waste, sustainable habits. This is where citizens most want action.

03

Build belonging, hope follows

The data shows hope tracks Inclusion (belonging, safety, voice) far more strongly than infrastructure. Investments in community fabric are not soft work — they produce measurable hope.

04

Make mental health visible

One in five citizens — and one in three older citizens — don't know where to turn for mental health help. Awareness is itself a public service that's missing.

05

Listen to long-term residents

People who've lived 20+ years in their locality rate it most critically. They're the most attached and the most clear-eyed. They are the locality's institutional memory.

06

Make WISE a yearly civic mirror

This is the second annual WISE Mumbai Pulse. With each cohort of fellows, the data grows sharper, the localities better mapped, the trends clearer. The goal: a citizen-led civic index Mumbai can rely on.

Methodology, in brief

How this was done

The WISE Locality Survey was administered by the youth fellows of Blue Ribbon Movement's Community Connect Fellowship 2026. Each fellow conducted interviews with citizens in their localities across Mumbai and its periphery (MMR), capturing 3,447 responses and counting.

The survey measured four pillars — Wellbeing, Inclusion, Sustainability, and Entrepreneurship & Expression.

The 16-item index shows strong internal reliability comparable to validated quality-of-life instruments. The full dataset (n=3,447) was retained for analysis; rows with uniform response patterns were flagged but kept after sensitivity testing confirmed they reflect real lived experiences in severely under-served localities.

This is a citizen-pulse survey, not a representative sample. Sample sizes vary across localities, and fellow-administration introduces a known correlation between fellow and locality (which means we cannot fully separate the two effects). Findings reported here are most reliable for the localities and wards with the largest sample sizes. Detailed methodology and the full dataset are available on request.