WISE Quotient 2026 · ward charts

The city, ward by ward.

Thirteen wards with enough responses to read, seventeen indicators each. Every chart is interactive: hover for the exact numbers, tap a legend to filter.

Chart 01 · the whole grid

Every ward, every indicator, one map.

Green is working, red is broken. The dark band across M/East is visible before you read a single number. Hover any cell.

Ward × indicator scores (1 = broken, 4 = working)

Chart 02 · ward ranking

A 1.5-point city.

The gap between the best-read ward and the worst is bigger than most indicators’ entire range. Hover for the area and sample size.

Ward average across all 17 indicators

Chart 03 · inside M/East

M/East is not one place.

The ward’s nine biggest localities span almost a full point. Averages hide this; the localities do not. Hover for each locality’s strongest and weakest indicator.

M/East localities, overall score

Chart 04 · heat traps

Twenty-six localities where summer is a verdict.

In every locality below, at least three in four residents disagree that summer is liveable. In several it is unanimous. Hover for the disagreement rate.

Heat-trap localities by heat score (lower = worse)

Chart 05 · the youth gap

Young citizens score the city lower on almost everything.

Each line connects the 18–24 score to the 35+ score for one indicator. Where the teal dot sits left of the grey one, youth are harsher judges.

18–24 vs 35+ scores, all 17 indicators

Chart 06 · city limits

Crossing the municipal boundary changes the verdict.

The same dumbbell view, MCGM wards against the wider metropolitan region.

MCGM vs rest of MMR, all 17 indicators

Chart 07 · what silence looks like

Where mental health is unspeakable.

“Don’t know” on the mental-health question is not randomness; it clusters by ward. High bars are wards where the question itself has no foothold yet.

“Don’t know” rate on mental-health support, by ward

WISE Quotient 2026 ward charts · 3,614 responses · rebuilt on the 5 July 2026 dataset